Liviu Andronic wrote: > 2011/4/27 Pavel Sanda <sa...@lyx.org>: > > ok, the new ro.po is in, layouttranslation regenerated. please update > > your tree. do you still see the problem above? > > > Bizarrely, yes. I just checked, and there is no 'Ċ£' (cedilla below) in > either ro.po or layouttranslations. So for example "Nota??ie" comes out > in italic font and as expected (comma below), while in same italic > font but not as expected "DemonstraĊ£ie" (cedilla below).
looking at the generated .tex i think i know where is the problem. there is no definition for demonstration, which means this would be handled by babel. if i understand correctly that also means that babel stuff uses cedilla everywhere while we switched to comma... why babel folks want to use cedilla? pavel
