On 10/24/2009 01:12 PM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
On 24/10/2009 19:03, rgheck wrote:
Packaging is of course a different issue. But is LyX a dependency of
elyxer or not? Alex insists it shouldn't be. That, indeed, is
supposed to be a large part of the point: elxyer can do its thing
even if LyX isn't installed. (See his last umpteen massages, passim.)
I myself still do not see why this is supposed to be at all helpful,
but that's his view. If so, then, on Linux anyway, elyxer should not
be packaged with LyX and should not even include LyX as a dependency.
So again, why one tree? You, of course, can do as you please with
your packaging. But if that is where the issue is, then that is where
the issue is: at the level of packaging.
OK, let then this be the final words. Pretty please...
I have several times tried to say just that. We have had this discussion
over, and over, and over.
rh
