On 24/10/2009 19:03, rgheck wrote:
Packaging is of course a different issue. But is LyX a dependency of elyxer or not? Alex insists it shouldn't be. That, indeed, is supposed to be a large part of the point: elxyer can do its thing even if LyX isn't installed. (See his last umpteen massages, passim.) I myself still do not see why this is supposed to be at all helpful, but that's his view. If so, then, on Linux anyway, elyxer should not be packaged with LyX and should not even include LyX as a dependency. So again, why one tree? You, of course, can do as you please with your packaging. But if that is where the issue is, then that is where the issue is: at the level of packaging.
OK, let then this be the final words. Pretty please...
Of course, I am all too aware that I'm probably just too stupid to understand. And I'm utterly inflexible, not a team player, right? I've never done anything for LyX, never worked together with anyone, never fixed bugs in code that doesn't matter to me, never commented on other people's code, never set aside my own ideas for a better suggestion of someone else's. I spend no time on the user's list answering questions, and I'm totally unresponsive to bug reports and enhancement requests. Right?
WRONG! That last paragraph is just plain bullshit of course... Abdel.
