Richard Heck wrote: > Pavel Sanda wrote: >> Richard Heck wrote: >> >>> I think maybe what we need is another LFUN, say LFUN_FONT_MATHBF, and we >>> need to make that toggleable. A preference seems the wrong way to go. One >>> might want both of these easily available, in toggleable form. >>> >> >> i propose to introduce LFUN_FONT_BOLD_MATHBF, which does exactly the same >> job as >> bold-font in 1.5, so old stylers can easily switch back. opinions? >> >> > Something like that seems the only way to go. I'm still puzzled, though, > about why we have two different ways to get boldface: InsetMathFont, set to > bold, and InsetMathBoldSymbol.
maybe the link below could help, there are some comments on this. >> i still wonder how is it that we changed ctrl+b behaviour, when most >> people >> on this thread confess they need mathbf actually. >> was this switch good idea after all? >> >> > Uwe says it was much discussed. Maybe so. hrrm much discussed, if it means the thread around this commit, it just follows the scenario of unadvertised commit and revert request :) maybe Enrico can say something about this? http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/msg136691.html pavel
