>>>>> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> If you use names for the insets they should IMO be the same names >> used in the .lyx file after \begin_inset (when this makes sense) Abdelrazak> Yes, that was the idea but I don't know the LyX format. You have to read the various read() and write() methods :) >> All in all, I think this thing is not for now. Abdelrazak> Even if we put the proper naming? Abdelrazak> The goal is not to use it more in 1.5, it is only to make Abdelrazak> sure that a new inset will always implement name() and Abdelrazak> that we didn't miss anything when InsetOld was removed. If we are sure that the naming is correct right now, I think it is enough (especially if/since we keep the file format in 1.5 lifetime). Abdelrazak> In 1.6, we could do a bunch of cleanup thanks to it. Also Abdelrazak> it will fit very well in the XML transition. I agree 100% with that, but I think this could start right at the beginning of 1.6. JMarc
