On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 05:52:16PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > José Matos wrote: > >On Friday 04 May 2007 16:39:32 Michael Gerz wrote: > >>Do we really have to repeat the term "virtual" in all subclasses? > > > > No, we don't but it is usual to do it to warn the developer that the > > method is virtual. It is good practice to document the function status > >although it is not required by the language. > > I've been told to always do it since my first C++ lesson so I took it > for mandatory and never tried my chance without it ;-)
If I had believed a single word in the only official lesson I ever had on C++ I'd probably given up programming a long time ago... Andre'
