On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 05:39:32PM +0200, Michael Gerz wrote: > Abdelrazak Younes schrieb: > >>>About this particular one, I proposed to make the method pure > >>>virtual, any objection? > >Here is the patch. > > Do we really have to repeat the term "virtual" in all subclasses?
It is formally not required. Some argue it is better to have, some argue it is better not to have, and current LyX practice is absolutely inconsistent. Andre'
