José Matos wrote:
On Friday 04 May 2007 16:39:32 Michael Gerz wrote:
Do we really have to repeat the term "virtual" in all subclasses?
No, we don't but it is usual to do it to warn the developer that the method
is virtual. It is good practice to document the function status although it
is not required by the language.
I've been told to always do it since my first C++ lesson so I took it
for mandatory and never tried my chance without it ;-)
This is described in several places, C++ faq, (More) Effective C++ and son
on...
I don't read doc :-)
Abdel.
