Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 05:47:15PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Michael Gerz wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes schrieb:
About this particular one, I proposed to make the method pure
virtual, any objection?
Here is the patch.
Do we really have to repeat the term "virtual" in all subclasses?
Yes I think, in case you want to reimplement the method in further
derived class. I am _not_ 100% sure this is needed.
It is only needed in the class in the 'most basic class' it is
implemented in. It will stay virtual in all derived classes no matter
whether you put 'virtual' there or not. I am 100% sure.
I do believe you. I'm used to always put it so I'll stay with my current
practice ;-)
Abdel.
