On Fri, 10 Dec 2010 13:39:01 +0100 Joakim Tjernlund <joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se> wrote:
> Scott Wood <scottw...@freescale.com> wrote on 2010/12/08 23:25:59: > > > > On Wed, 8 Dec 2010 17:02:45 -0500 > > Mark Mason <ma...@postdiluvian.org> wrote: > > > > > I don't think that using a software NAND controller instead of the LBC > > > FCM mode is all that bad. Again, I haven't actually done it, so check > > > the MTD docs, but I'm pretty sure the software is meant to do that, so > > > it doesn't even really constitute a "fix". Assuming that it is > > > supported then I doubt that configuring the NAND layer to use your > > > setup would be any harder than configuring the FCM. > > > > The MTD layer supports some really simple NAND controllers, but what do > > you mean by not having a controller at all? Hooking everything up to > > GPIO? Using UPM? > > > > There is already a UPM NAND driver, BTW. > > > > You would lose hardware ECC and the ability to be interrupt-driven (the > > latter should be possible with SW changes, using GPIO interrupts). > > hmm, you think it would be possible to use one of the IRQ pins instead? GPIO should be fine, software just needs to be changed to use the interrupt functionality. An external IRQ line would let you limit interrupts to rising edges rather than all edges, though you'd lose the ability to directly read the line status. -Scott _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
