On Wed, 8 Dec 2010 17:02:45 -0500 Mark Mason <ma...@postdiluvian.org> wrote:
> I don't think that using a software NAND controller instead of the LBC > FCM mode is all that bad. Again, I haven't actually done it, so check > the MTD docs, but I'm pretty sure the software is meant to do that, so > it doesn't even really constitute a "fix". Assuming that it is > supported then I doubt that configuring the NAND layer to use your > setup would be any harder than configuring the FCM. The MTD layer supports some really simple NAND controllers, but what do you mean by not having a controller at all? Hooking everything up to GPIO? Using UPM? There is already a UPM NAND driver, BTW. You would lose hardware ECC and the ability to be interrupt-driven (the latter should be possible with SW changes, using GPIO interrupts). -Scott _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev