Scott Wood <scottw...@freescale.com> wrote on 2010/12/08 23:25:59: > > On Wed, 8 Dec 2010 17:02:45 -0500 > Mark Mason <ma...@postdiluvian.org> wrote: > > > I don't think that using a software NAND controller instead of the LBC > > FCM mode is all that bad. Again, I haven't actually done it, so check > > the MTD docs, but I'm pretty sure the software is meant to do that, so > > it doesn't even really constitute a "fix". Assuming that it is > > supported then I doubt that configuring the NAND layer to use your > > setup would be any harder than configuring the FCM. > > The MTD layer supports some really simple NAND controllers, but what do > you mean by not having a controller at all? Hooking everything up to > GPIO? Using UPM? > > There is already a UPM NAND driver, BTW. > > You would lose hardware ECC and the ability to be interrupt-driven (the > latter should be possible with SW changes, using GPIO interrupts).
hmm, you think it would be possible to use one of the IRQ pins instead? _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
