On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 01:08:59AM +0300, Valentine wrote:
>>> So, probably the best way would be to fix that in u-boot
>>> amcc/sequoia/sdram.c by doing mtsdram(DDR0_10, 0x00000100); instead 
>>> of  mtsdram(DDR0_10, 0x00000300);
>>> Sorry, for confusion, but after reviewing the docs, I think that
>>> only REDUC interpretation has to be fixed. The chips select part 
>>> should  be fixed in u-boot sdram code for Sequoia as was originally 
>>> proposed by  Mikhail.
>>
>> Ok, so we're back to using Mikhail's original patch then?
>>
>> josh
>
> Yes, but until u-boot is fixed this will break Sequoia/Rainier support.

Well, that's sort of a problem.  The wrapper will have to deal with both
a fixed and unfixed u-boot because not everyone will update their u-boot
with the fix.

So we need a patch for the wrapper that works in all cases.

josh
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to