On Thursday 12 March 2009, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Thu, 2009-03-12 at 07:02 +0100, Stefan Roese wrote: > > I'll apply the U-Boot patch today. But as Josh pointed out, we should > > try to > > find a way for the bootwrapper to work in all cases. > > uboot is passing some kind of bt_t to the wrapper or a full > device-tree ?
Both is possible. Older U-Boot versions only passed the bd_t struct to the kernel. For those U-Boot's the wrapper is needed. More recent U-Boot versions support passing a device-tree blob to the kernel. U-Boot patches the correct memory size in this blob. As a matter of fact, I never used the wrapper before. U-Boot supports passing the device-tree blob to Linux since quite some time now. Best regards, Stefan _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
