On Tue, Sep 19 2000, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > I don't see any reason why there can't be multiple p points in the current > > elevator. > > Without the proposed modification after the last barrier in the queue all the > requests should be in order. I haven't had a chance to really look at Peter's mods yet, but surely the current elevator can have many entries with 0 sequence. As an example, say the start sequence is 3 and we received request sector 10...1 in descending order. The sorted order would then be 7[3] 8[2] 9[1] 10[0] 3[3] 4[2] 5[1] 6[0] 1[3] 2[2] (sector[sequence]) -- * Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: An elevator algorithm (patch) Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: An elevator algorithm (patch) Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: An elevator algorithm (patch) Peter Osterlund
- Re: An elevator algorithm (patch) Rik van Riel
- Re: An elevator algorithm (patch) Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: An elevator algorithm (patch) Peter Osterlund
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: An elevator algorithm (pa... Jens Axboe
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: An elevator algorithm (pa... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: An elevator algorithm (pa... Jens Axboe
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: An elevator algorithm (pa... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: An elevator algorithm (pa... Jens Axboe
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: An elevator algorithm (pa... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: An elevator algorithm (pa... Jens Axboe
- Re: An elevator algorithm Peter Osterlund
- Re: An elevator algorithm Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: An elevator algorithm (patch) Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: An elevator algorithm (pa... Jens Axboe
- Re: An elevator algorithm (patch) Marcelo Tosatti
- Re: An elevator algorithm (patch) Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: An elevator algorithm (patch) Peter Osterlund
- Re: An elevator algorithm (patch) Andrea Arcangeli