On Tue, Sep 19 2000, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > But there may be several p points in the queue, how are you going > > to keep track of all of them? > > With the current elevator there should be only 1 p point, but with the I don't see any reason why there can't be multiple p points in the current elevator. > modification Peter suggested there can be more and we should track the one > more on the back of the queue. I don't think it's worthwhile. Agree, I don't think the added complexity would be worth it. -- * Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: An elevator algorithm (patch) Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: An elevator algorithm (patch) Rik van Riel
- Re: An elevator algorithm (patch) Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: An elevator algorithm (patch) Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: An elevator algorithm (patch) Peter Osterlund
- Re: An elevator algorithm (patch) Rik van Riel
- Re: An elevator algorithm (patch) Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: An elevator algorithm (patch) Peter Osterlund
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: An elevator algorithm (pa... Jens Axboe
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: An elevator algorithm (pa... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: An elevator algorithm (pa... Jens Axboe
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: An elevator algorithm (pa... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: An elevator algorithm (pa... Jens Axboe
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: An elevator algorithm (pa... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: An elevator algorithm (pa... Jens Axboe
- Re: An elevator algorithm Peter Osterlund
- Re: An elevator algorithm Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: An elevator algorithm (patch) Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: An elevator algorithm (pa... Jens Axboe
- Re: An elevator algorithm (patch) Marcelo Tosatti
- Re: An elevator algorithm (patch) Andrea Arcangeli