On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 04:50:26AM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote: > When the latency gets above 10 minutes, I'd call it starvation ;) Me too, no argument about that. > Not average latency no, but the starvation issue should be > fixed... 2.2.18pre9aa1 delivers acceptable latency for me with the same latency control logic of 2.4.x. I will check test9 soon. Andrea - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: An elevator algorithm Ragnar Kjørstad
- Re: An elevator algorithm (patch) Peter Osterlund
- Re: An elevator algorithm (patch) Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: An elevator algorithm (patch) Peter Osterlund
- Re: An elevator algorithm (patch) Rik van Riel
- Re: An elevator algorithm (patch) Gérard Roudier
- Re: An elevator algorithm (patch) Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: An elevator algorithm (patch) Rik van Riel
- Re: An elevator algorithm (patch) Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: An elevator algorithm (patch) Rik van Riel
- Re: An elevator algorithm (patch) Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: An elevator algorithm (patch) Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: An elevator algorithm (patch) Peter Osterlund
- Re: An elevator algorithm (patch) Rik van Riel
- Re: An elevator algorithm (patch) Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: An elevator algorithm (patch) Peter Osterlund
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: An elevator algo... Jens Axboe
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: An elevator algo... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: An elevator algo... Jens Axboe
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: An elevator algo... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: An elevator algo... Jens Axboe