On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 09:41:17PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote: > I don't see any reason why there can't be multiple p points in the current > elevator. Without the proposed modification after the last barrier in the queue all the requests should be in order. Andrea - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: An elevator algorithm (patch) Rik van Riel
- Re: An elevator algorithm (patch) Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: An elevator algorithm (patch) Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: An elevator algorithm (patch) Peter Osterlund
- Re: An elevator algorithm (patch) Rik van Riel
- Re: An elevator algorithm (patch) Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: An elevator algorithm (patch) Peter Osterlund
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: An elevator algorithm (pa... Jens Axboe
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: An elevator algorithm (pa... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: An elevator algorithm (pa... Jens Axboe
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: An elevator algorithm (pa... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: An elevator algorithm (pa... Jens Axboe
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: An elevator algorithm (pa... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: An elevator algorithm (pa... Jens Axboe
- Re: An elevator algorithm Peter Osterlund
- Re: An elevator algorithm Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: An elevator algorithm (patch) Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: An elevator algorithm (pa... Jens Axboe
- Re: An elevator algorithm (patch) Marcelo Tosatti
- Re: An elevator algorithm (patch) Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: An elevator algorithm (patch) Peter Osterlund