On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 11:09:47PM +0200, Peter Osterlund wrote: > So that leaves two choices: > > 1. Perfect elevator (CSCAN) without the O(1) optimization. (My second > patch.) We can try with 1. first. Andrea - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: An elevator algorithm (patch) Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: An elevator algorithm (patch) Peter Osterlund
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: An elevator algo... Jens Axboe
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: An elevator algo... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: An elevator algo... Jens Axboe
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: An elevator algo... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: An elevator algo... Jens Axboe
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: An elevator algo... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: An elevator algo... Jens Axboe
- Re: An elevator algorithm Peter Osterlund
- Re: An elevator algorithm (patch) Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: An elevator algorithm (patch) Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: An elevator algo... Jens Axboe
- Re: An elevator algorithm (patch) Marcelo Tosatti
- Re: An elevator algorithm (patch) Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: An elevator algorithm (patch) Peter Osterlund
- Re: An elevator algorithm (patch) Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: An elevator algorithm Hans Reiser
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: An elevator algorithm Xuan Baldauf
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: An elevator algorithm Ragnar Kjørstad
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: An elevator algorithm Hans Reiser