On 2014/08/12 12:16:12, mail_philholmes.net wrote:
----- Original Message ----- From: <mailto:d...@gnu.org> To: <mailto:philehol...@googlemail.com>;
<mailto:tdanielsmu...@googlemail.com>;
<mailto:em...@philholmes.net> Cc: <mailto:re...@codereview-hr.appspotmail.com>;
<mailto:lilypond-devel@gnu.org>
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2014 1:09 PM Subject: Re: Adds incipit section to NR (issue 108270043 mailto:byphilehol...@googlemail.com)
> On 2014/08/12 11:54:38, http://email_philholmes.net wrote: > >> I can post this as a bug, but I'm guessing it would be tricky to
fix.
> Would >> you object to scaling the dimensions of the incipit (in the incipit > code) >> line-width and indent by the 1.76 factor, to work round the
problem?
> > Yes, I would object to scaling the dimensions of the incipit
line-width
> and indent by the 1.76 factor since that is just an ad-hoc
approximation
> for a single case.
Shame you didn't when I first asked.
> Is there a reason you don't scale by the ratio of output-scale
between
> grob-layout and layout? > > https://codereview.appspot.com/108270043/
Tell me how and I'll do it.
I think the problem you are trying to work around will likely go away when you give "incipit-width" the same treatment as "short-indent" everywhere it occurs in scm/paper.scm. It's sort of irritating that this is not equally easy to do for a user-level extension. Even then, one could check the setting of "mm" and scale by that. But when implementing this as a "native" feature, we are probably better off using the native mechanisms. https://codereview.appspot.com/108270043/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
