Jeremy Huntwork wrote these words on 01/17/06 23:11 CST: > You said 'Let the community speak', I said they already have. That's the > point.
I think perhaps you didn't understand what I was driving at. You've probably contributed 20,000 words on the subject, most of them reiterating what you had said before. Many have argued and pointed out things they were not comfortable with your original proposal. I simply was trying to get *others* to say something. Jeremy, a week ago or so, I asked you to itemize the list of things that Trac does better than our existing web components. As I have *always* done when I've proposed changes, I expected a short analysis of 1)what we had 2)why it needs to be changed 3)where we want to go with it 4)what the new method buys us and 5)what are the long-term benefits. Though I don't *expect* you to provide the answers to the questions, I feel it to be nice if your were to provide them. A courtesy sort of thing. I don't feel you provided those answers. Again, my opinion, and perhaps I'm reading too much into what is your opinion as opposed to what is fact. My comments tonight I suppose are because it is just now, tonight, after, what? a week or two of your proposal that we find out that you cannot divorce the different capabilities of Trac from one another? That you must more-or-less go all or nothing? This was not said from the beginning. -- Randy rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10 i686] 23:16:00 up 115 days, 8:40, 3 users, load average: 1.00, 0.97, 0.71 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
