Jeremy Huntwork wrote these words on 01/18/06 00:15 CST: > Finally, it wasn't a copout, it was unecessary work. Apply the same > advice here that you hand out to newbies in lfs-support. If you can't be > bothered to read, why should I answer the questions for you?
Absolutely ludricrous. Never mind Jeremy. You are not on the same page. You are trying to compare me asking you about some foreign package that I've never been exposed to, which has nothing to do with LFS, me, my situation, or anything I've ever been associated with, and because you are recommending the LFS community move to it... with an LFS support user who doesn't read the book. Please, Jeremy, learn to debate. You don't make any sense at all. This is the most lame argument I've *ever* heard. -- Randy rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10 i686] 00:41:00 up 115 days, 10:05, 3 users, load average: 0.08, 0.16, 0.41 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
