Randy McMurchy wrote:
What bothers me the most now, and what everyone should consider, is
that the guy that is pushing this whole deal said earlier this
evening that he would like to start tomorrow with the conversion to
put this crap in production...
Please re-read the post:
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-dev/2006-January/055364.html
I read it differently as giving an example how fast the conversion could
be done. If he said "lets do it right now" and didn't say "if I start
tomorrow" I would agree with how you read into it.
KNOWING FULL WELL THAT IT DOESN'T WORK RIGHT
That is not correct. Trac itself works prefectly fine. A module to
import bugs didn't work for one bug and stopped the import. Just need
to solve the import problem, it doesn't mean all of Trac is broken. Not
fair in my opinion.
And something we need to really consider next time around when the
suggestion is proposed again. How do we believe that what is being
said is really accurate?
Because you and others can review what is being suggested? That is
after all what he asked in this thread. It is a RFC afterall.
Right now, we are just hoping that the initiator of the suggestion
has a clue what he's talking about. Now, we also have to worry that
what is being said is actually accurate.
I think you are blowing this out of proportion. This is a RFC, Jeremy
couldn't import all the bugs in his first try, but now you are saying he
doesn't have a clue what he's talking about and worrying that what is
being said is actually accurate. I believe this is totally unfair.
Justin
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
