But Mark, according to Bates, Kelly did agree to drop his salary. According to Bates it was Bates himself who wouldn't agree to Kelly's proposition. Personally I find it incredible that Bates wouldn't take the risk on Kelly - there's no obvious financial reason for that rejection - which gives rise to the speculation that there were other factors at work. Dare one think perhaps Wise's relationships with his players?
Damian PS Wilko out too ;)) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Humphries" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >. I can quite see how a senior player earning a > high multiplier of what everyone else at the club is on refusing to drop > their salary for 1 season and help out the club and the other lads might > piss him off. It would piss me off. And had this been, say, Kewell or > Viduka we were talking about then Im quite sure you lot would be up in > arms > about them too. > > Kelly may have had his reasons for not wanting or being able to drop his > salary (and I suspect his agent and the pfa had a big say in the matter), > but ultimately it's Wise who is acting in the best interests of us Leeds > fans here. > > Its frankly astounding that Kelly didn't agree to something, _______________________________________________ the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors. Leedslist mailing list [email protected] http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist The Leeds List - "where never is heard a discouraging word..."
