> Hang on... so if we go up, Rich is proven wrong, but if we 
> don't go up, you aren't proven wrong? Can you ever be wrong?

i think what Mark is saying is that he "should be given a chance"  Thats not
really a true or false statement, therefore he can't be right or wrong, its
just his opinion.  

anyway re Horsefield;
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/teams/l/leeds_united/5242674.stm

I can't really understand what all this fuss is about, doesn't anyone
remember us buying Brolin, Sharpe & Huckerby for £4m, Johnson £7m, giving
weatherall away etc etc, those bits of business makes the recent coming and
going look like the work of a genius!

ttfn

Richard


> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 03 August 2006 14:31
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [LU] in ands outs
> 
> Hang on... so if we go up, Rich is proven wrong, but if we 
> don't go up, you aren't proven wrong? Can you ever be wrong?
> 
> Some distinct having cake and eating thereof going on here.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mark Humphries
> Sent: 03 August 2006 15:23
> To: 'Richard Walker'
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [LU] in ands outs
> 
> 
> :)
> 
> I don't understand how I can be proven wrong though?
> 
> Im not making any claims about what he will or wont do.  All 
> I have said is that he deserves a chance.  If he proves to be 
> not up to it then I will be with you lot agreeing he should go.
> 
> I don't see any hypocrisy or conflict in that stance.
> 
> You are basically making the easy accusation that he isn't 
> good enough to get us up, then again it wouldn't matter if we 
> had Jose Morihno as manager, it's a f*cking difficult job 
> getting promotion, theres many a good manager who hasn't achieved it.
> 
> Time will tell if you are proven correct, but then the 
> chances are you will be.  Have a look at the odds for ANY 
> manager to not get promotion, they will all be odds on, that 
> alone tells you its not a difficult assumption to make.
> 
> One thing we all agree is that we hope you are proven wrong!
> 
> 
> *******
> 
> This message and any attachment are confidential and may be 
> privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure.  If you 
> are not the intended recipient, please telephone or email the 
> sender and delete this message and any attachment from your 
> system.  If you are not the intended recipient you must not 
> copy this message or attachment or disclose the contents to 
> any other person.
> 
> For further information about Clifford Chance please see our 
> website at http://www.cliffordchance.com or refer to any 
> Clifford Chance office.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list 
> administrators accept no liability for the personal views and 
> opinions of contributors. 
> Leedslist mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
> oh alright then :-)
> 


_______________________________________________
the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators 
accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors.
Leedslist mailing list
[email protected]
http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
oh alright then :-)

Reply via email to