You do have a spectacularly patronising manner Mark. What the 'argument' is about is a matter of spin. Another spin is:
Rich and me think Blackwell should have been got rid of as manager. Mark thinks Blackwell should still be manager (whether you want to append "given a chance" is irrelevant, you either think he should be manager or not). If we are struggling come the autumn, Rich and me are right (we don't want to be, but we would be), and Mark would be wrong. We gave a Reid a chance as manager as we felt we ought to after he kept us up. That was proven to be a wrong decision. Anyhow, I'll take my bat home now, as this has run its course really and is getting too negative - we all ultimately want Leeds to win. -----Original Message----- From: Mark Humphries [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 03 August 2006 15:45 To: 'Sean Emmott'; Woolmer, David (F&CM AMS) Cc: [email protected] Subject: RE: [LU] in ands outs Thanks Sean, that's exactly it and hopefully its short and sweet enough for people to now understand what the argument is actually all about! - ******* This message and any attachment are confidential and may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, please telephone or email the sender and delete this message and any attachment from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you must not copy this message or attachment or disclose the contents to any other person. For further information about Clifford Chance please see our website at http://www.cliffordchance.com or refer to any Clifford Chance office. _______________________________________________ the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors. Leedslist mailing list [email protected] http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist oh alright then :-)
