Thanks Randy and Pat for all your elaborated experiences and information,
as I consider these critical heritage safety data for risk assessment of
flying KR2... That was a critical piece of data (5 engine outs with 5 safe
landings!) which will probably convince me to give up my idea of spending
money (and sacrifice useful weight!) on BRS...!

Has anyone heard any in-flight structure failures at all on KRs?

Dr. Hsu

On Fri, Apr 3, 2020, 12:09 PM Randy Smith via KRnet <krnet@list.krnet.org>
wrote:

>  If you look at a Cirrus it is totaled when you pull the chute. They bury
> all the lines under the glass. I had 5 engine out ( Actually 1 was prop and
> flange left the plane) 3 over Missouri 1 in the Florida panhandle and 1 at
> home in lake Dallas. Every time I either landed on a runway or a pasture. I
> pushed the nose over to just above stall speed and road it to the ground.
> Every time the plane came home in 1 piece and I had it flying within a
> month. 3 off those where VW engines and 1 Was an lyc 85 hp. My last engine
> was a rebuilt 0-200. One thing i can say and I will bet Mark agrees that
> when that prop stops it is nothing like pulling the power back to practice.
>     On Friday, April 3, 2020, 12:44:57 PM CDT, Mark Langford via KRnet <
> krnet@list.krnet.org> wrote:
>
>  Dr. Hsu wrote:
>
>  > Also, I asked f anyone have tired or already installed BRS on your KR2?
> I
>  > can't believe no one has done that at all, considering so many safety
> risk
>  > factors associated with the design concept (competing design
> objectives or
>  > requirements...)?
>
> I think most KR folks would answer "too heavy, too expensive, and I'd
> rather glide it to the ground".  Having done more than my share of
> dead-stick landings in a KR, I can tell you that it normally works out
> pretty well....at least you are in control of the plane.  When you pull
> the handle on a chute, you have no idea where or what you will land on,
> and your plane will probably die in the process.  If you fly it all the
> way to the ground, chances are good that you can land on a runway, a
> road, or a field, and the plane lives to fly another day.  Structural
> failures are almost unheard of in KRs.....it's usually the engine.  Why
> kill an airplane when it's the engine's fault?
>
> Mark Langford
> m...@n56ml.com
> http://www.n56ml.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Search the KRnet Archives at
> https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
> Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
> see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change
> options.
> To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Search the KRnet Archives at
> https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
> Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
> see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change
> options.
> To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org
>
_______________________________________________
Search the KRnet Archives at https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
options.
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org

Reply via email to