Dr. Hsu wrote:
> Also, I asked f anyone have tired or already installed BRS on your KR2? I
> can't believe no one has done that at all, considering so many safety
risk
> factors associated with the design concept (competing design
objectives or
> requirements...)?
I think most KR folks would answer "too heavy, too expensive, and I'd
rather glide it to the ground". Having done more than my share of
dead-stick landings in a KR, I can tell you that it normally works out
pretty well....at least you are in control of the plane. When you pull
the handle on a chute, you have no idea where or what you will land on,
and your plane will probably die in the process. If you fly it all the
way to the ground, chances are good that you can land on a runway, a
road, or a field, and the plane lives to fly another day. Structural
failures are almost unheard of in KRs.....it's usually the engine. Why
kill an airplane when it's the engine's fault?
Mark Langford
m...@n56ml.com
http://www.n56ml.com
_______________________________________________
Search the KRnet Archives at https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change
options.
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org
