Thankfully it is still Friday!!
Let's see.....I think I finally have it.
It is a KR if you:
stretch it 14 inches,
make it 6 inches wider,
make the sides vertical,
build it 200+ pounds over plans gross wt.,
use a different airfoil,
install an O235,
change the horizontal airfoil,
use Dr. Dean Hinges,
build it with sliding or forward tilt canopy,
use Fowler flaps,
make the fuselage a foam/fiberglass sandwich,
make folding wings.  (are these changes all made by "designers?")
It is not a KR if you:
build it light and to the plans except for adding slightly more wing area
or make it a single place to give it a stall speed of 51mph instead of
the Rand Robinson published stall speed of 52mph.....one little mph,
have it cruise at about 135mph.....(and there are a lot of KR's flying
that do not exceed the LSA cruise speed specs.)  

Please don't try to stifle those who are discussing how to lower the
stall speed.  By the way I did not get to vote on the following--  "It
has been agreed upon here that an ELSA legal KR 1 or 2 would not remotely
be a KR anymore"
We are not talking about an ELSA anyway--we are talking about an Amateur
Built Experimental KR that is legal for a Sport Pilot to fly.  The LSA's
category planes are factory built or built from an approved factory kit.

If you took a poll of the Netters you would probably find that relatively
few have finished and flown a KR or any other homebuilt.  We do look up
to those of you who have.
Rich Hartwig
Waunakee, WI
rhartwi...@juno.com


>Rich
>Checking the archives will let ANYONE know about the literal months of
dicsussion that has already gone on about trying >to make the KR whatever
fit a category it was not designed for. Everyone that is arguing in favor
of building a KR to meet >ELSA standards has never built a KR to
completion, or owns a flying KR. Most are not designers, with the
exception of a >few that comment.

>It is not that Mark L or Mark J is putting a damper on appropriate
threads or not, but this list is supposed to be devoted to >just KR
building and flying.  We all contribute things from time to time that are
not strictly KR material, maybe just pilot >material, but aimed at safety
or preventing similar mistakes, etc...  Friday's are reserved for the off
the wall remarks.

>What I am bringing up is that I am not trying to squash a thread that
has merit, but rather to encourage an interested builder >to do his
research, and then consult with those that are doing directly. It has
been agreed upon here that an ELSA legal KR >1 or 2 would not remotely be
a KR anymore, and so it would really be more appropriate to have their
own list and >discussions. The topic got beaten up BAD just last year,
with nothing more that alot of supposition about what could be >done, yet
no one has done that yet. But what is known is that discussing an ELSA KR
which would really deserve its own >new name at that point, would be like
discussing the Taylor monoplane here; similar design (the blueprint for
Ken for this >plane) but different plane.

>Case in point is Dana Overall: Dana is building an RV8 so he doesn't
discuss things here that apply to metal airplanes, or >RVs unless it is
generic and also applies to us, then he gladly shares it.  An ELSA legal
KR is no longer a KR but a new >design. Discussing building processes
would be the same, and so in my mind would be on target, but
certification issues, >and design modification parameters and the like
would be more appropriate to another list for the new design.

>I am not trying to push anyone out or hurt anyone's feelings, but it
seems that once or twice a year we have to rmeind >everyone that this
list is NOT a general discussion list for any and all. It is a KR
builders and pilots list for sharing >wisdom and experience directly
related to building and flying KR's, not other aircraft development, what
happened to my >sister, etc... and issues that threaten us like Brian's
Case in Jacksonville.

>If Mark L or Mark J feel I am off target then I conceed.  But I have
watched thme have to make such remarks time and >again to knock things
back on track for THIS list.

>Colin
>N96TA
>Ormond Beach, FL

Reply via email to