Hi, Magni, and everyone else, > The Linuxchix lists are actually female lists, and I don't really think > men will feel discriminated against just because they aren't welcome to > send their mails to such a list until 24 hours have passed. Don't bet on it. I know we haven't seen the "why do you need LinuxChix?" posts from clueless men in a very long time. If we did post such a rule I expect some men would jump all over us for discriminating against them, and so on. > (Am I lucky that the linuxchix-lists are non-flaming areas? ;)) I think we are all lucky that way. Best, Caity _______________________________________________ issues mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/issues
- Re: [issues] Conversation monopolizat... Mary Gardiner
- RE: [issues] Conversation monopol... Melanie Draper
- Re: [issues] Conversation mo... jenn
- Re: [issues] Conversation mo... Mary Gardiner
- Re: [issues] Conversation mo... Caitlyn Martin
- Re: [issues] Conversation mo... Mary Gardiner
- Re: [issues] Conversation monopolizat... Magni Onsoien
- Re: [issues] Conversation monopol... Mary Gardiner
- Re: [issues] Conversation mo... Rick Scott
- Re: [issues] Conversation monopol... Marie Fischer
- Re: [issues] Conversation monopol... Caitlyn Martin
- Re: [issues] Conversation monopolizat... Telsa Gwynne
- Re: [issues] Conversation monopol... Caitlyn Martin
- Re: [issues] Conversation mo... Rebecca J. Walter
- [issues] reading man pages [... Jenny Brown (was Gable)
- Re: [issues] Conversation monopolizat... James A. Sutherland
- Re: [issues] Conversation monopolization Caitlyn Martin
- Re: [issues] Conversation monopolizat... Andrew Plumb
- Re: [issues] Conversation monopolization Gina Lanik
- Re: [issues] Conversation monopolization Mary Gardiner