Laurel Fan wrote: > Excerpts from linuxchix: 21-Mar-101 Re: [issues] Conversation m.. by > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I've a tendancy to not-answer unless I am absolutely certain I > > know the answer, or there's not been an answer for 12 hours or so. > > > > Can anyone explain to me why I do that? > > Maybe because if there's a reasonable chance that someone else knows > the answer, and there's a reasonable chance that you aren't right, the > 'rational' choice is to wait and see if other people do know the > answer? Hi, Laurel, Exactly! (Well... at least for me.) I know there are lots of times I think I might have a clue but I'm not 100% sure, and I am pretty confident that somebody on the list just *has* to know better than I do. Usually there really is someone like that. Best, Caity _______________________________________________ issues mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/issues
- Re: [issues] Conversation monopolization Telsa Gwynne
- Re: [issues] Conversation monopolization jenn
- Re: [issues] RTFM and RTFM Man page Rick Scott
- Re: [issues] Conversation monopolization James A. Sutherland
- Re: [issues] Conversation monopolization Magni Onsoien
- Re: [issues] Conversation monopolization jenn
- Re: [issues] Conversation monopolization Amy Alexander
- Re: [issues] Conversation monopolization Laurel Fan
- Re: [issues] Conversation monopolization Rebecca J. Walter
- Re: [issues] Conversation monopolization Caitlyn Martin
- Re: [issues] Conversation monopolization Mary Gardiner
- RE: [issues] Conversation monopolization Melanie Draper
- Re: [issues] Conversation monopolization jenn
- Re: [issues] Conversation monopolization Mary Gardiner
- Re: [issues] Conversation monopolization Caitlyn Martin
- Re: [issues] Conversation monopolization Mary Gardiner
- Re: [issues] Conversation monopolization Magni Onsoien
- Re: [issues] Conversation monopolization Mary Gardiner
- Re: [issues] Conversation monopolization Rick Scott
- Re: [issues] Conversation monopolization Marie Fischer