Matt Turner schrieb:
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Joerg Dietrich
> <dietrich_jo...@t-online.de> wrote:
>> I beg to differ. Maybe a bit redundant but not irrelevant.
>> Zack wrote about the problems of publishing on the PS3.
>> But this is a Sony-problem not a GPL-problem.
>> The tone of this discussion was that some poor
>> Free Software developers got shafted by these
>> bad bad Nexiuz guys. But as long as they obey the rules of the GPL
>> they have every right to do so. Or they ask
>> every contributor to transfer their copyrights.
> 
> Yes, but apparently they did not do this.
> 
> If contributing to a GNU project (eg, gcc, glibc) you have to
> physically sign a copyright assignment form and mail it to the FSF
> offices. Clearly contributors did not do that in the case of Nexuiz.
> See Mathieu Olivier's response in both this thread and the top of page
> 7 in the Nexuiz Forum thread.
> (http://www.alientrap.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=6043&start=180)
> 
>> You for example where asking if these guys
>> licensed the engine from idsoftware.
>> If they use the GPLed version of the engine
>> they have a license from idsoftware as stated in the GPL.
>> Just because a software is GPL doesn't mean
>> I can't try to earn some money with it.
> 
> I'm not claiming otherwise. Too bad they took a bunch of code from
> independent developers whose copyrights they do not hold.
> 
> Matt

On this I am 100% with you. As long as they do not
own the copyright (by official transfer) they can not
distribute the game as closed source.

Joerg
_______________________________________________
ioquake3 mailing list
ioquake3@lists.ioquake.org
http://lists.ioquake.org/listinfo.cgi/ioquake3-ioquake.org
By sending this message I agree to love ioquake3 and libsdl.

Reply via email to