Changing the thread name....
On Thu, 2003-02-27 at 15:12, Raj Mathur wrote:
> I agree, we probably need a Meet to discuss this.  However, why don't
> we first take some time to talk about Linux on the list?  At least
> three people (including you) have suggested that we have a Meet to
> thrash these issues out again.  However, before we commit ourselves to
> anything let's view the issue from all sides.  While we all tend to
> understand Linux's technical benefits, the philosophy and ideals that
> underlie those benefits may still be a question mark.

> I'm inviting you, and all you members of Linux-Delhi who read this
> mail, to post your views on freedom in software onto the list.  I can
> only speak from one side of many the view points possible, but if
> anyone has any questions regarding the history of Linux, the GPL and
> other licenses, GNU or the current social-political-economic issues
> around free software I'd be glad to answer them to the bast of my
> ability.
> 
> Equally, those who believe that proprietary software can promote Linux
> and/or freedom are also welcome to put their points of view across.
> If there's an angle I've missed, please feel free to bring it up.
Few Questions in this perspective 
1. Development Models based on FLOSS/Linux compared to other development
models for commercial softwares on Linux/Other OS' es
2. Business Models based on FLOSS/Linux compared to other Business
Models for commercial softwares on Linux/Other OS' es
3. Cost of Software -- various components in the Total Cost of Ownership
4. Who and what pays the developers if Software is to be free.
5. What is the best way of promoting Linux.
6. Where does commercial software fit in.
7. How best can Linux-Tech be promoted.
More questions to follow ??
Tarun Dua

          ================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe in subject header. 
Check archives at http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd%40wpaa.org

Reply via email to