On Mon 31/Mar/2025 14:30:27 +0200 Taavi Eomäe wrote:
On 31/03/2025 15:25, Brotman, Alex wrote:
I have a hard time believing that all the libraries focusing on DKIMv1 will
go back and create some code to handle this case.
Indeed, they probably won't. Which is exactly why it might be better to have
those old implementations continue stripping signatures they're breaking.
On the other hand, there is MTA software that looks for the DKIM-Signature
header field without regard to versions or keys, but only to disable any
rewriting that might corrupt verification.
Best
Ale
--
_______________________________________________
Ietf-dkim mailing list -- ietf-dkim@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to ietf-dkim-le...@ietf.org
