On Sun 23/Mar/2025 20:16:20 +0100 Allen Robinson wrote:
By having two independent headers, DKIM2 systems can continue to participate in
DKIM1 however they do now, so DKIM1 verifiers would observe no change in the
signatures they are being presented as a result of DKIM2 adoption.
I agree. Yet, the following looks silly:
DKIM2-Signature: v=1; ...
Better would be to have:
DKIM-Signature: v=2; ...
Best
Ale
--
_______________________________________________
Ietf-dkim mailing list -- ietf-dkim@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to ietf-dkim-le...@ietf.org
