On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 1:56 AM Alessandro Vesely <ves...@tana.it> wrote:
> There is room for a lot of compatibility. If we don't change the > canonicalizations, a DKIM1 verifier will be able to verify a DKIM2 > signature, > limited to DKIM1 semantics. [...] I can't tell if this sentence confuses me, or is expressly contrary to what we probably want here. That is, it's possible we specifically do not want a DKIM verifier to be able to claim success over a DKIM2 signature, accidentally or otherwise. -MSK
_______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list -- ietf-dkim@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to ietf-dkim-le...@ietf.org
