It appears that Taavi Eomäe <ta...@zone.ee> said: >-=-=-=-=-=- >On 31/03/2025 18:11, Michael Thomas wrote: >> If they ignore the plain and clear text of STD 76, what makes you >> think they will honor it in a new protocol? > >Which is what is not being asked from those implementations, if the >version is incremented instead of a new set of headers. Those >implementations will simply continue to remove all the DKIM signatures >they find.
I don't understand what point you are making. The spec says that's wrong. How would the presence or absence of v=2 make it less wrong? R's, John _______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list -- ietf-dkim@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to ietf-dkim-le...@ietf.org
