On 3/30/2025 12:10 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
I seem to recall previous discussions have suggested that the "v" tag shouldn't have been included in the first place; if things are so different that you need to change the version, you may as well change the name of the header field altogether.


Yup.

If it is upward compatible, the new features self-announce. No version mark needed.

If it not upward compatible, it is a new protocol.

d/

--
Dave Crocker

Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
bluesky: @dcrocker.bsky.social
mast: @dcrocker@mastodon.social

_______________________________________________
Ietf-dkim mailing list -- ietf-dkim@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to ietf-dkim-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to