On 3/30/2025 12:10 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
I seem to recall previous discussions have suggested that the "v" tag
shouldn't have been included in the first place; if things are so
different that you need to change the version, you may as well change
the name of the header field altogether.
Yup.
If it is upward compatible, the new features self-announce. No version
mark needed.
If it not upward compatible, it is a new protocol.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
bluesky: @dcrocker.bsky.social
mast: @dcrocker@mastodon.social
_______________________________________________
Ietf-dkim mailing list -- ietf-dkim@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to ietf-dkim-le...@ietf.org