On Fri 08/Nov/2024 14:28:53 +0100 Richard Clayton wrote:
In message <cal0qlwzu-j49jgyhs6qpk67zkvrjhez3rvc1frgoeu+ecp0...@mail.gma
il.com>, Murray S. Kucherawy <superu...@gmail.com> writes
A small operator or individual with a good idea that lacks the
resources to test at scale shouldn't be excluded unnecessarily.
Are the large operators reasonably willing to test promising ideas
even if they're not their own?
Since a great deal of the functionality of DKIM2 will in practice be
placed into standard libraries, providing running code for such a
library will make it possible for large operators to deploy experimental
ideas for particular domains that they host ... and hence "scale" can be
achieved that way.
Some features, such as breaking multiple recipients into multiple messages (as
if they were destined to multiple domains) and sending bounces back to the
previous hop seem difficult to implement into a filter, perhaps depending on
which API different MTAs provide. Libraries cannot do that.
Rather than at scale, we may need to test specific features partially.
Best
Ale
--
_______________________________________________
Ietf-dkim mailing list -- ietf-dkim@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to ietf-dkim-le...@ietf.org
