On 16 Nov 2024, at 13:30, John Levine wrote: > It appears that Murray S. Kucherawy <superu...@gmail.com> said: >> A small operator or individual with a good idea that lacks the resources to >> test at scale shouldn't be excluded unnecessarily. Are the large operators >> reasonably willing to test promising ideas even if they're not their own? > > Based on private discussions with people who've been working on DKIM2, I > don't think > it will be a problem. The large providers want something that they can > deploy but > I have seen no reason to believe they think that only they can design it.
I hope that the unnamed people who’ve been working on DKIM2 (presumably large operators) are not using you as a proxy to avoid adhering to the Note Well, especially with respect to patents and patent applications. I would rather have a direct conversation with everyone on this mailing list. -Jim _______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list -- ietf-dkim@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to ietf-dkim-le...@ietf.org
