On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 02:52:07AM -0500, no-re...@cfengine.com wrote:
>Forum: Cfengine Help
>Subject: Re: Extended solutions guide and YOUR HELP!
>Author: mark
>Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,19429,19574#msg-19574
>
>Let's try to make a short list of programs. In my experience ordinary wikis 
>will fail because they quickly get out of  control unless they are managed -- 
>which is an unwanted overhead.

Wikis can be really useful, and can be a real mess.  I think that as
long as there is a good gatekeeper (or team of gatekeepers) to keep
spammers out, they can work well.  All of the major wiki platforms have
most of the features that have been mentioned:  version history (and
implicitly the ability to revert), inter-linking pages, tagging, access
control, access levels, formatting, etc.

I do not think that a completely moderated system will work for two
reasons:  1) it's a lot of overhead for the moderators.  2) I think it
makes the barrier to entry too high for people who want to contribute.


>I suggest taggable free submissions that can be organized post-factum using 
>something to scan the contributions automatically. I like the ability to vote 
>on the code too.

Could you elaborate on "taggable free submissions"?  How is this
different from pages/snippets/code from having arbitrary tags, suitable
for later organization?

-- 
Jesse Becker
NHGRI Linux support (Digicon Contractor)
_______________________________________________
Help-cfengine mailing list
Help-cfengine@cfengine.org
https://cfengine.org/mailman/listinfo/help-cfengine

Reply via email to