github  

Messages by Thread

• [PR] perf: use `new_repeated` when converting scalar to an array [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use `new_repeated` when converting scalar to an array [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use `new_repeated` when converting scalar to an array [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use `new_repeated` when converting scalar to an array [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use `new_repeated` when converting scalar to an array [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use `new_repeated` when converting scalar to an array [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use `new_repeated` when converting scalar to an array [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use `new_repeated` when converting scalar to an array [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use `new_repeated` when converting scalar to an array [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use `new_repeated` when converting scalar to an array [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use `new_repeated` when converting scalar to an array [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use `new_repeated` when converting scalar to an array [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use `new_repeated` when converting scalar to an array [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use `new_repeated` when converting scalar to an array [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use `new_repeated` when converting scalar to an array [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] [branch-51] Back ports Fix for Creating Null FixedSizeBinary Arrays to DF 51Branch [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [branch-51] Backport Fix for Creating Null FixedSizeBinary Arrays to DF 51Branch [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [branch-51] Backport Fix for Creating Null FixedSizeBinary Arrays to DF 51Branch [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [branch-51] Backport Fix for Creating Null FixedSizeBinary Arrays to DF 51Branch [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [branch-51] Backport Fix for Creating Null FixedSizeBinary Arrays to DF 51Branch [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [branch-51] Backport Fix for Creating Null FixedSizeBinary Arrays to DF 51Branch [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [branch-51] Backport Fix for Creating Null FixedSizeBinary Arrays to DF 51Branch [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [branch-51] Backport Fix for Creating Null FixedSizeBinary Arrays to DF 51Branch [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [branch-51] Backport Fix for Creating Null FixedSizeBinary Arrays to DF 51Branch [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [branch-51] Backport Fix for Creating Null FixedSizeBinary Arrays to DF 51Branch [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat: support invoking table functions with tables rather than a single expression [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support invoking table functions with tables rather than a single expression [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support invoking table functions with tables rather than a single expression [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support invoking table functions with tables rather than a single expression [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Andrew Lamb Weekly-ish Open Source plan - 2025-11-24 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Andrew Lamb Weekly-ish Open Source plan - 2025-11-24 [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Andrew Lamb Weekly-ish Open Source plan - 2025-12-01 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Andrew Lamb Weekly-ish Open Source plan - 2025-12-01 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Andrew Lamb Weekly-ish Open Source plan - 2025-12-01 [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Update criterion requirement from 0.7 to 0.8 in /sqlparser_bench [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Update criterion requirement from 0.7 to 0.8 in /sqlparser_bench [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Support of new Syntax [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
• [PR] chore(deps): bump sphinx from 8.2.3 to 9.0.0 in /docs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump sphinx from 8.2.3 to 9.0.0 in /docs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump sphinx from 8.2.3 to 9.0.0 in /docs [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] fix: `rstest` is a DEV dependency [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: `rstest` is a DEV dependency [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] chore(deps): bump cc from 1.2.47 to 1.2.48 in /native [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump cc from 1.2.47 to 1.2.48 in /native [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] chore(deps): bump the proto group in /native with 2 updates [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump the proto group in /native with 2 updates [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [I] Spill error (oom) with sort merge join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Spill error (oom) with sort merge join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Spill error (oom) with sort merge join [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Release DataFusion `51.1.0` (Minor) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `51.1.0` (Minor) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `51.1.0` (Minor) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `51.1.0` (Minor) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `51.1.0` (Minor) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `51.1.0` (Minor) [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] chore(deps): bump taiki-e/install-action from 2.62.59 to 2.62.60 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump taiki-e/install-action from 2.62.59 to 2.62.60 [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] chore(deps): bump syn from 2.0.108 to 2.0.111 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump syn from 2.0.108 to 2.0.111 [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] chore(deps): bump testcontainers-modules from 0.13.0 to 0.14.0 [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] chore(deps): bump criterion from 0.7.0 to 0.8.0 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump criterion from 0.7.0 to 0.8.0 [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] chore(deps): bump the proto group with 2 updates [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump the proto group with 2 updates [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump the proto group with 2 updates [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] chore(deps): bump the arrow-parquet group with 7 updates [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump the arrow-parquet group with 7 updates [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump the arrow-parquet group with 7 updates [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Deduplicate Spark function code with native/default datafusion function code [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] SQL queries containing unsupported 'FETCH NEXT' keyword execute successfully (SQLStorm) [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] chore: merge make_array and spark array [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: merge make_array and spark array [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: merge make_array and spark array [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: merge make_array and spark array [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: merge make_array and spark array [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] WIP: merge all subquery into depentend join [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Schema error: No field named t.b. Valid fields are t.a. [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Improve error messages when coercion fails [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Improve error messages when coercion fails [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Improve error messages when coercion fails [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Improve error messages when coercion fails [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Add `force_filter_selections` to restore `pushdown_filters` behavior [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add `force_filter_selections` to restore `pushdown_filters` behavior [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add `force_filter_selections` to restore `pushdown_filters` behavior [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add `force_filter_selections` to restore `pushdown_filters` behavior prior to parquet 57.1.0 upgrade [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add `force_filter_selections` to restore `pushdown_filters` behavior prior to parquet 57.1.0 upgrade [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] feat: integrate batch coalescer with repartition when unsorted [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: integrate batch coalescer with repartition exec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: integrate batch coalescer with repartition exec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: integrate batch coalescer with repartition exec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: integrate batch coalescer with repartition exec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: integrate batch coalescer with repartition exec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: integrate batch coalescer with repartition exec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: integrate batch coalescer with repartition exec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: integrate batch coalescer with repartition exec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: integrate batch coalescer with repartition exec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: integrate batch coalescer with repartition exec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: integrate batch coalescer with repartition exec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: integrate batch coalescer with repartition exec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: integrate batch coalescer with repartition exec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: integrate batch coalescer with repartition exec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: integrate batch coalescer with repartition exec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: integrate batch coalescer with repartition exec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: integrate batch coalescer with repartition exec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: integrate batch coalescer with repartition exec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: integrate batch coalescer with repartition exec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: integrate batch coalescer with repartition exec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: integrate batch coalescer with repartition exec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: integrate batch coalescer with repartition exec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: integrate batch coalescer with repartition exec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: integrate batch coalescer with repartition exec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: integrate batch coalescer with repartition exec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: integrate batch coalescer with repartition exec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: integrate batch coalescer with repartition exec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: integrate batch coalescer with repartition exec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: integrate batch coalescer with repartition exec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: integrate batch coalescer with repartition exec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: integrate batch coalescer with repartition exec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: integrate batch coalescer with repartition exec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: integrate batch coalescer with repartition exec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: integrate batch coalescer with repartition exec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: integrate batch coalescer with repartition exec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: integrate batch coalescer with repartition exec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: integrate batch coalescer with repartition exec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: integrate batch coalescer with repartition exec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: integrate batch coalescer with repartition exec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: integrate batch coalescer with repartition exec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: integrate batch coalescer with repartition exec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: integrate batch coalescer with repartition exec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: integrate batch coalescer with repartition exec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: integrate batch coalescer with repartition exec [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] chore: update group of 3 crates to rust 2024 edition [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: update group of 3 crates to rust 2024 edition [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Oracle dialect [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Oracle dialect [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Oracle dialect [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Oracle dialect [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Better graphviz explains physical plans [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Automated way to run benchmarks on a dedicated machine from PRs [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] TEST PR [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] TEST PR [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] TEST PR [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] TEST PR [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] TEST PR [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] TEST PR [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] TEST PR [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] TEST PR [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] TEST PR [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] TEST PR [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] TEST PR [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] TEST PR [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] TEST PR [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] TEST PR [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] TEST PR [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] TEST PR [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] TEST PR [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] TEST PR [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] TEST PR [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] TEST PR [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] TEST PR [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] TEST PR [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] TEST PR [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] TEST PR [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] TEST PR [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] TEST PR [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] TEST PR [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] TEST PR [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] TEST PR [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] TEST PR [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] TEST PR [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] TEST PR [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] TEST PR [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] TEST PR [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] TEST PR [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] TEST PR [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] TEST PR [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] TEST PR [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] TEST PR [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] TEST PR [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] TEST PR [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] TEST PR [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] TEST PR [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] TEST PR [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] feat: Support log for Decimal32 and Decimal64 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Support log for Decimal32 and Decimal64 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Support log for Decimal32 and Decimal64 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Support log for Decimal32 and Decimal64 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Support log for Decimal32 and Decimal64 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Support log for Decimal32 and Decimal64 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Support log for Decimal32 and Decimal64 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Support log for Decimal32 and Decimal64 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Support log for Decimal32 and Decimal64 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Support log for Decimal32 and Decimal64 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Support log for Decimal32 and Decimal64 [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Native decimal 32/64/256 bit support for log [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Native decimal 32/64/256 bit support for log [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] dev: Add typos check to the local `dev/rust_lint.sh` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] dev: Add typos check to the local `dev/rust_lint.sh` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] dev: Add typos check to the local `dev/rust_lint.sh` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] dev: Add typos check to the local `dev/rust_lint.sh` [datafusion] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages