github  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [PR] Date / time / interval arithmetic improvements [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Date / time / interval arithmetic improvements [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Date / time / interval arithmetic improvements [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Date / time / interval arithmetic improvements [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Date / time / interval arithmetic improvements [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Date / time / interval arithmetic improvements [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Date / time / interval arithmetic improvements [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Date / time / interval arithmetic improvements [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Date / time / interval arithmetic improvements [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Date / time / interval arithmetic improvements [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Date / time / interval arithmetic improvements [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Date / time / interval arithmetic improvements [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Date / time / interval arithmetic improvements [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Date / time / interval arithmetic improvements [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Date / time / interval arithmetic improvements [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Date / time / interval arithmetic improvements [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Date / time / interval arithmetic improvements [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Date / time / interval arithmetic improvements [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Date / time / interval arithmetic improvements [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Date / time / interval arithmetic improvements [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Date / time / interval arithmetic improvements [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Date / time / interval arithmetic improvements [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Support user defined functions as expressions in FFI calls [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] minor: Refactor expression microbenchmarks to remove duplicate code [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] minor: Refactor expression microbenchmarks to remove duplicate code [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] minor: Refactor expression microbenchmarks to remove duplicate code [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] minor: Refactor expression microbenchmarks to remove duplicate code [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] minor: Refactor expression microbenchmarks to remove duplicate code [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] minor: Refactor expression microbenchmarks to remove duplicate code [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] minor: Refactor expression microbenchmarks to remove duplicate code [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [I] Standardize microbenchmarks [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] minor: add tests for coercible signature considering nulls/dicts/ree [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] minor: add tests for coercible signature considering nulls/dicts/ree [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] minor: add tests for coercible signature considering nulls/dicts/ree [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] How Null/Dictionary/REE datatypes interact with `Coercion` API [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] How Null/Dictionary/REE datatypes interact with `Coercion` API [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] feat: support timestamp + duration(second) arithmetic [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support timestamp + duration(second) arithmetic [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support timestamp + duration(second) arithmetic [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support timestamp + duration(second) arithmetic [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] fix: [19450]Added flush for tokio file(substrait) write [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: [19450]Added flush for tokio file(substrait) write [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: [19450]Added flush for tokio file(substrait) write [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Remove Whitespace Tokens from Parser [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove Whitespace Tokens from Parser [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
• [PR] chore(deps): bump sphinx-reredirects from 1.0.0 to 1.1.0 in /docs [datafusion-sandbox] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump sphinx-reredirects from 1.0.0 to 1.1.0 in /docs [datafusion-sandbox] via GitHub
• [PR] chore(deps): bump taiki-e/install-action from 2.64.0 to 2.65.1 [datafusion-sandbox] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump taiki-e/install-action from 2.64.0 to 2.65.1 [datafusion-sandbox] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump taiki-e/install-action from 2.64.0 to 2.65.1 [datafusion-sandbox] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump taiki-e/install-action from 2.64.0 to 2.65.1 [datafusion-sandbox] via GitHub
• Re: [I] update rust edition to 2024 [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] update rust edition to 2024 [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] update rust edition to 2024 [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] update rust edition to 2024 [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] update rust edition to 2024 [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• [PR] chore(deps): bump sphinx-reredirects from 1.0.0 to 1.1.0 in /docs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump sphinx-reredirects from 1.0.0 to 1.1.0 in /docs [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] chore(deps): bump assertables from 9.8.2 to 9.8.3 in /native [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump assertables from 9.8.2 to 9.8.3 in /native [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] chore(deps): bump cc from 1.2.49 to 1.2.50 in /native [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump cc from 1.2.49 to 1.2.50 in /native [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] chore(deps): bump reqwest from 0.12.25 to 0.12.26 in /native [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump reqwest from 0.12.25 to 0.12.26 in /native [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] chore(deps): bump insta from 1.44.3 to 1.45.0 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump insta from 1.44.3 to 1.45.0 [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] chore(deps): bump aws-config from 1.8.11 to 1.8.12 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump aws-config from 1.8.11 to 1.8.12 [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] chore(deps): bump log from 0.4.28 to 0.4.29 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump log from 0.4.28 to 0.4.29 [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] chore(deps): bump taiki-e/install-action from 2.64.2 to 2.65.1 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump taiki-e/install-action from 2.64.2 to 2.65.1 [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] `cases::serialize::tests::serialize_simple_select` test fails intermittently [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] `cases::serialize::tests::serialize_simple_select` test fails intermittently [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] `cases::serialize::tests::serialize_simple_select` test fails intermittently [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] minor: implement more arms for `get_data_types()` for `NativeType` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] minor: implement more arms for `get_data_types()` for `NativeType` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] minor: implement more arms for `get_data_types()` for `NativeType` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] minor: implement more arms for `get_data_types()` for `NativeType` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] minor: implement more arms for `get_data_types()` for `NativeType` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] minor: implement more arms for `get_data_types()` for `NativeType` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] minor: implement more arms for `get_data_types()` for `NativeType` [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] spark `sha2` need to have custom nullability [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] spark `sha2` need to have custom nullability [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Optimize RequiredIndices column collection [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize RequiredIndices column collection [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize RequiredIndices column collection [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize RequiredIndices column collection [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize RequiredIndices column collection [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize RequiredIndices column collection [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Update to_unixtime udf function to support a consistent set of argument types [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Update to_unixtime udf function to support a consistent set of argument types [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] feat: Add per-expression evaluation timing metrics to ProjectionExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add per-expression evaluation timing metrics to ProjectionExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add per-expression evaluation timing metrics to ProjectionExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add per-expression evaluation timing metrics to ProjectionExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add per-expression evaluation timing metrics to ProjectionExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add per-expression evaluation timing metrics to ProjectionExec [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Redesign the try_reverse_output to support more cases [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Redesign the try_reverse_output to support more cases [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Redesign the try_reverse_output to support more cases [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Redesign the try_reverse_output to support more cases [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Redesign the try_reverse_output to support more cases [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Redesign the try_reverse_output to support more cases [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Redesign the try_reverse_output to support more cases [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Redesign the try_reverse_output to support more cases [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Redesign the try_reverse_output to support more cases [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Redesign the try_reverse_output to support more cases [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Redesign the try_reverse_output to support more cases [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Redesign the try_reverse_output to support more cases [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Redesign the try_reverse_output to support more cases [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Redesign the try_reverse_output to support more cases [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Redesign the try_reverse_output to support more cases [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Redesign the try_reverse_output to support more cases [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Redesign the try_reverse_output to support more cases [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Redesign the try_reverse_output to support more cases [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Redesign the try_reverse_output to support more cases [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Redesign the try_reverse_output to support more cases [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Redesign the try_reverse_output to support more cases [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Redesign the try_reverse_output to support more cases [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Redesign the try_reverse_output to support more cases [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Redesign the try_reverse_output to support more cases [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Redesign the try_reverse_output to support more cases [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Redesign the try_reverse_output to support more cases [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Redesign the try_reverse_output to support more cases [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Redesign the try_reverse_output to support more cases [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Redesign the try_reverse_output to support more cases [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Redesign the try_reverse_output to support more cases [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Redesign the try_reverse_output to support more cases [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Redesign the try_reverse_output to support more cases [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] feat: Support sort prefix removal for logical constants in Sort Pushdown [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Support sort prefix removal for logical constants in Sort Pushdown [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: Set correct nullability for luhn_check (#19177) [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] spark `crc32` need to have custom nullability [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] spark `luhn_check` need to have custom nullability [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: spark crc32 custom nullability [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: spark crc32 custom nullability [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix massive spill files for StringView/BinaryView columns [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix massive spill files for StringView/BinaryView columns [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix massive spill files for StringView/BinaryView columns [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix massive spill files for StringView/BinaryView columns [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix massive spill files for StringView/BinaryView columns [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix massive spill files for StringView/BinaryView columns [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix massive spill files for StringView/BinaryView columns [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix massive spill files for StringView/BinaryView columns [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] bench: increase in_list benchmark coverage [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] bench: increase in_list benchmark coverage [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] bench: increase in_list benchmark coverage [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] bench: increase in_list benchmark coverage [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] bench: increase in_list benchmark coverage [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Update `to_unixtime` udf function to support a consistent set of argument types [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Update `to_unixtime` udf function to support a consistent set of argument types [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Update `to_unixtime` udf function to support a consistent set of argument types [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Update `to_unixtime` udf function to support a consistent set of argument types [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Update `to_unixtime` udf function to support a consistent set of argument types [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Update `to_unixtime` udf function to support a consistent set of argument types [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Update `to_unixtime` udf function to support a consistent set of argument types [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Update `to_unixtime` udf function to support a consistent set of argument types [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Update `to_unixtime` udf function to support a consistent set of argument types [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Update `to_unixtime` udf function to support a consistent set of argument types [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Update `to_unixtime` udf function to support a consistent set of argument types [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Update `to_unixtime` udf function to support a consistent set of argument types [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Update `to_unixtime` udf function to support a consistent set of argument types [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Update `to_unixtime` udf function to support a consistent set of argument types [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Make benchmark statement valid [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Make benchmark statement valid [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • [PR] Make benchmark statement valid [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Make benchmark statement valid [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Make benchmark statement valid [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Make benchmark statement valid [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
• [PR] Optimize memory footprint of view arrays from `ScalarValue::to_array_of_size` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize memory footprint of view arrays from `ScalarValue::to_array_of_size` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize memory footprint of view arrays from `ScalarValue::to_array_of_size` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize memory footprint of view arrays from `ScalarValue::to_array_of_size` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize memory footprint of view arrays from `ScalarValue::to_array_of_size` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize memory footprint of view arrays from `ScalarValue::to_array_of_size` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize memory footprint of view arrays from `ScalarValue::to_array_of_size` [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Improve performance by reducing string copies [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Improve performance by reducing string copies [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
• [I] Optimize memory footprint of view arrays from `ScalarValue::to_array_of_size` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Optimize memory footprint of view arrays from `ScalarValue::to_array_of_size` [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] minor: refactoring of some `ScalarValue` code [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] minor: refactoring of some `ScalarValue` code [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] minor: refactoring of some `ScalarValue` code [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] minor: refactoring of some `ScalarValue` code [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] minor: refactoring of some `ScalarValue` code [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Consider adding `TypeSignatureClass::Any` variant [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Consider adding `TypeSignatureClass::Any` variant [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Consider adding `TypeSignatureClass::Any` variant [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Consider adding `TypeSignatureClass::Any` variant [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Consider adding `TypeSignatureClass::Any` variant [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Add Physical Extension Protobuf Codec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Physical Extension Protobuf Codec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Physical Extension Protobuf Codec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Physical Extension Protobuf Codec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Physical Extension Protobuf Codec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Physical Extension Protobuf Codec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Physical Extension Protobuf Codec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Physical Extension Protobuf Codec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Physical Extension Protobuf Codec [datafusion] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages