On Sun, 2015-08-09 at 17:30 +0200, hasufell wrote: > On 08/09/2015 05:19 PM, Tobias Klausmann wrote: > > On Sun, 09 Aug 2015, Sven Vermeulen wrote: > > > > I'd just go with "Gentoo-Bug". The X- is pointless since it was > > for eXtending Email-Headers. And what we do is only linked in > > style. > > > > I'd be fine with that and add a reference to the kernel guideline [0] to > the wiki as well, so that it is clear that we also allow/use Acked-by, > Reviewed-by, Suggested-by and whatnot. > > I'll wait for more ++ though. > > > [0] https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
++ from me. And a question: what about multiple bugs fixed by one commit? Is it Gentoo-Bug: 1234567, 1234568 or Gentoo-Bug: 1234567 Gentoo-Bug: 1234568
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
