-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 08/09/2015 11:49 AM, Davide Pesavento wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 8:43 AM, Mike Gilbert <flop...@gentoo.org>
> wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 11:30 AM, hasufell <hasuf...@gentoo.org>
>> wrote:
>>> On 08/09/2015 05:19 PM, Tobias Klausmann wrote:
>>>> Hi!
>>>> 
>>>> On Sun, 09 Aug 2015, Sven Vermeulen wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> On Sun, Aug 09, 2015 at 04:43:36PM +0200, Dirkjan Ochtman
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> I think "X-Gentoo-Bug: 557022" also makes the job
>>>>>>> easier for tools that parse commit messages.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I don't. Just the "bug " prefix should be fine for almost
>>>>>> all purposes, even for tools.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I'm pretty sure the majority of developers don't care that
>>>>> one developer uses "X-Gentoo-Bug" and another just adds it
>>>>> to the commit title.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I like /guidelines/ in the sense that, if I don't know
>>>>> something, I can look it up. But don't make it mandatory
>>>>> until we start depending on it (for instance, when we would
>>>>> automate stuff based on the content of the commit 
>>>>> message).
>>>> 
>>>> I'd just go with "Gentoo-Bug". The X- is pointless since it
>>>> was for eXtending Email-Headers. And what we do is only
>>>> linked in style.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> I'd be fine with that and add a reference to the kernel
>>> guideline [0] to the wiki as well, so that it is clear that we
>>> also allow/use Acked-by, Reviewed-by, Suggested-by and
>>> whatnot.
>>> 
>>> I'll wait for more ++ though.
>> 
>> I like Gentoo-Bug. Much nicer without the X-.
>> 
> 
> +1 for Gentoo-Bug (or Gentoo-bug? not sure about the
> capitalization)
> 
I guess I'm the third +1 here. Gentoo-Bug: xxxxxx is far better than
linking to it, since the URL scheme may change in the future. Bug
number is not likely to and it's clear what the number is referring to.

- -- 
Daniel Campbell - Gentoo Developer
OpenPGP Key: 0x1EA055D6 @ hkp://keys.gnupg.net
fpr: AE03 9064 AE00 053C 270C  1DE4 6F7A 9091 1EA0 55D6
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=ydn7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to