On 08/09/2015 05:19 PM, Tobias Klausmann wrote: > Hi! > > On Sun, 09 Aug 2015, Sven Vermeulen wrote: > >> On Sun, Aug 09, 2015 at 04:43:36PM +0200, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: >>>> I think "X-Gentoo-Bug: 557022" also makes the job easier for tools that >>>> parse commit messages. >>> >>> I don't. Just the "bug " prefix should be fine for almost all >>> purposes, even for tools. >> >> I'm pretty sure the majority of developers don't care that one developer >> uses "X-Gentoo-Bug" and another just adds it to the commit title. >> >> I like /guidelines/ in the sense that, if I don't know something, I can look >> it up. But don't make it mandatory until we start depending on it (for >> instance, when we would automate stuff based on the content of the commit >> message). > > I'd just go with "Gentoo-Bug". The X- is pointless since it was > for eXtending Email-Headers. And what we do is only linked in > style. >
I'd be fine with that and add a reference to the kernel guideline [0] to the wiki as well, so that it is clear that we also allow/use Acked-by, Reviewed-by, Suggested-by and whatnot. I'll wait for more ++ though. [0] https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
