Dnia 2015-08-09, o godz. 16:09:29
hasufell <hasuf...@gentoo.org> napisał(a):

> On 08/09/2015 03:58 PM, Michael Weber wrote:
> > commit:     40b3fd64ec9c5d6d94f0f0897740bc77622c24a1
> > Author:     Michael Weber <xmw <AT> gentoo <DOT> org>
> > AuthorDate: Sun Aug  9 13:58:26 2015 +0000
> > Commit:     Michael Weber <xmw <AT> gentoo <DOT> org>
> > CommitDate: Sun Aug  9 13:58:26 2015 +0000
> > URL:        https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=40b3fd64
> > 
> > sci-libs/opencascade: add USE=vtk (bug 557022, thanks Helmut Jarausch).
> > 
> 
> I was wondering if we should set a standard for referencing bug reports.
> The portage team already does something like that:
> https://github.com/gentoo/portage/commit/b7149002bf23889f280c502afe6ceda0b1345ca3
> 
> Following that, the commit could have been:
> =====
> sci-libs/opencascade: add USE=vtk
> 
> thanks to Helmut Jarausch
> 
> X-Gentoo-Bug: 557022
> X-Gentoo-Bug-url: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=557022
> =====

Which is terribly redundant. Just put the whole bug URL. Advantages:

- keeps the bug namespaced to bugs.gentoo.org,
- has the bug no inside,
- is convenient -- you can click it instead of copy-pasting the no.

Also there are some standard keywords that are sometimes used to
reference bugs, like 'Fixes:' used by x.org.

-- 
Best regards,
Michał Górny
<http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/>

Attachment: pgpXxgIIsdJ32.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to