On 08/09/2015 09:56 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > Dnia 2015-08-09, o godz. 16:09:29 > hasufell <hasuf...@gentoo.org> napisał(a): > >> On 08/09/2015 03:58 PM, Michael Weber wrote: >>> commit: 40b3fd64ec9c5d6d94f0f0897740bc77622c24a1 >>> Author: Michael Weber <xmw <AT> gentoo <DOT> org> >>> AuthorDate: Sun Aug 9 13:58:26 2015 +0000 >>> Commit: Michael Weber <xmw <AT> gentoo <DOT> org> >>> CommitDate: Sun Aug 9 13:58:26 2015 +0000 >>> URL: https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=40b3fd64 >>> >>> sci-libs/opencascade: add USE=vtk (bug 557022, thanks Helmut Jarausch). >>> >> >> I was wondering if we should set a standard for referencing bug reports. >> The portage team already does something like that: >> https://github.com/gentoo/portage/commit/b7149002bf23889f280c502afe6ceda0b1345ca3 >> >> Following that, the commit could have been: >> ===== >> sci-libs/opencascade: add USE=vtk >> >> thanks to Helmut Jarausch >> >> X-Gentoo-Bug: 557022 >> X-Gentoo-Bug-url: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=557022 >> ===== > > Which is terribly redundant. Just put the whole bug URL. Advantages: > > - keeps the bug namespaced to bugs.gentoo.org, > - has the bug no inside, > - is convenient -- you can click it instead of copy-pasting the no. > > Also there are some standard keywords that are sometimes used to > reference bugs, like 'Fixes:' used by x.org. >
I am not sure what exactly you do propose.
