Andrew Gaffney wrote: > Mike Frysinger wrote: >> On Wednesday 20 September 2006 12:38, Alec Warner wrote: >>> I think Chris's primary concern is one of "Tell us whats up before it >>> happens." >> >> why should he care ? some Gentoo guys take catalyst and produce >> stage4s directed at certain applications > > He cares because they're basically extending the roll of releng without > it being under releng's control. I know I'd be annoyed if they release a > x86 stage4 and then *I* gets bugs, but I know absolutely nothing about > it. Having 2 projects doing almost the same thing is just going to > confuse users.
As somebody's already mentioned, the embedded project releases GNAP and has a releng liaison. There's no reason the seeds project couldn't also have a releng liaison, which seems to resolve the main dispute here. Thanks, Donnie
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
