Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Andrew Gaffney wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Wednesday 20 September 2006 12:38, Alec Warner wrote:
I think Chris's primary concern is one of "Tell us whats up before it
happens."
why should he care ? some Gentoo guys take catalyst and produce
stage4s directed at certain applications
He cares because they're basically extending the roll of releng without
it being under releng's control. I know I'd be annoyed if they release a
x86 stage4 and then *I* gets bugs, but I know absolutely nothing about
it. Having 2 projects doing almost the same thing is just going to
confuse users.
As somebody's already mentioned, the embedded project releases GNAP and
has a releng liaison. There's no reason the seeds project couldn't also
have a releng liaison, which seems to resolve the main dispute here.
That's not the issue. The issue is that there should *already* be a releng
liason, but nobody from releng seems to know anything about this project.
--
Andrew Gaffney http://dev.gentoo.org/~agaffney/
Gentoo Linux Developer Installer Project
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
